The group you are assessing:	Save your file. Use this format: group being assessed your group.doc So an example would be TIV Voltes5.doc – where TIV is the group being assessed and Voltes5 is your group.
Your group name:
A	B	C	D
Are ideas presented connected with the aim of the project?	Are the ideas presented clearly supported with evidence and logical argument?	Is it easy to follow & to understand? (Are the slides clear and easy to follow e.g. use of new pictures, words, graphs)	Overall impression (is it a group presentation etc.?)
40%	30%	20%	10%

Comments (space will expand as you type)
Grade (%)

Rules and process

Rules.

The spirit of feedback should be positive and constructive.

Personal attacks are not acceptable.

This is not an opportunity to deal with past grievances.

Avoid personalizing your comments e.g., “Bob comments in section one are rubbish”.

Keep comments as objective as possible.

Process

The following are some notes to help you with this process.

Focus on constructive comments that include the positive and negative e.g.: The section on company background is simple, clear and easy to follow.

The format on p.6 changes. See the font size there as compared to p.5.

Keep comments as objective as possible by highlighting sections/position

We found your research question 2 (section 3.1.2) hard to understand.

In terms of the sections above (ABCD):

A: Does the group cover key aspects of the material? E.g., if it is a proposal are the nine sections included?

B: Is relevant detail included in each of the sections? E.g., Is the part of the proposal on time frames cover the period of the course? Are the questions/objectives clear, precise?

C: Is the layout easy to follow and attractive? E.g., are sections numbered? Page numbers? Bullets used?

D: Is this a group effort? E.g., Does the report flow as a ‘whole’ or does it look like several parts with little connection? Do the ideas compliment each other all the way through?